Showing posts with label guillermo del toro. Show all posts
Showing posts with label guillermo del toro. Show all posts

Monday, January 1, 2018

Top Everything of 2017

With 2017 now behind us, tons of media outlets and blogs are spending time reviewing everything that happened this past year.  Articles about people's favorite movies, the most influential news stories, stand out sport stars, and other such lists focused around a particular topic are filling the internet.  Plenty of those lists are gonna be worth reading.

For me, though, I find too many things interesting to focus on only one subject.  So, like I did for 2014, 2015, and 2016, I'll be reviewing my top pick for a variety of different categories from 2017, including multiple movie, MMA, science, and news story categories.  They're subjective as hell, but who's top list isn't?  The sort of people who pretend ranked lists of their favorite things are objective are the kind of people you don't wanna talk to at a party.

Anywho, here we go!

(Spoilers have been avoided for all the entries about movies)

MOVIE: Blade Runner 2049

This was the hardest entry for me to pick on this list.  Not just among the movie categories, but the list in its entirety.  Blade Runner 2049 and Get Out were both such excellent movies in such different ways that I had no idea how to figure out which one I liked more.  I opted for Blade Runner 2049 just so that I could also make up for not choosing Arrival as my favorite movie of 2016 on last year's post, as I didn't see the movie until after I wrote it.

Enough about other movies, though.  Let's talk 2049.  Going into this movie, I was more than a little skeptical.  While I love the original Blade Runner, I just couldn't see any sort of need for a sequel, especially with so many of the questions raised by the end of the film.  Where could they go in a sequel that would both feel fresh while also connecting to the first in a meaningful way?

This movie put my fears to rest.  The movie connects well to the first Blade Runner and its themes while still being distinct enough to not feel like a rehash.  Like with the first one, the plot uses both human and non-human characters to explore its central question: what does it mean to be alive, to be human?  Yet it approaches these questions from a different angle than the first one, starting with Ryan Gosling's character K, who is a very different protagonist than Harrison Ford's Richard Decker.

This movie has everything you'd hope for in a Blade Runner movie: thematic depth, great writing, memorable characters, and a gorgeous, superbly-shot world.  It also has a memorable ending scene, whose final moments have stuck with me in a way few movie endings have.  While the movie does have a few minor stumbles, overall it is a worthy successor to the original movie and not just my favorite movie of the year, but (along with Get Out) one of my favorite movies of the decade so far.

COMEDY MOVIE: The Big Sick

Structurally, The Big Sick isn't any different from most other romantic comedies.  The general formula for the genre is that the couple meets, attraction happens, adversity ensues, it breaks them up, they marinate on their feelings, they end up back together.  This is exactly what happens in The Big Sick.

What makes the movie so outstanding, though, is the execution.  The performances by every member of the cast are top notch, the "comedy" part of "romantic comedy" is actually given serious attention (as well as often used in service of the characters), and there is real conflict based on Kumail having to choose between his new romantic interest and making his family happy with an arranged marriage (more on that in a moment).  The lack of meaningful conflict in most romantic comedies is why I cannot stomach most of the genre.  Most couple "conflicts" in these movies are due to some sort of ridiculous misunderstanding that any adult (or teenager, or child) with any sort of human communication skills could easily explain.  It's manufactured, lazy drama brought up simply to drive the couple apart without making the audience mad at either romantic partner.

Not here, though.  Kumail has real reason to be conflicted.  What I love about the way he resolves it, though, is that he is careful not to reject his parents' way of life.  He emphasizes that it doesn't work for him while recognizing that it has worked for them and made them good people.  So many movies involving kids rejecting the wishes of their parents in favor of true love involve the kid wholly rejecting their parents and the movie wholeheartedly agreeing with the kid's decision.  It's nice to see a story where Kumail loves his parents and their culture, even if it doesn't work for him.

Also, it's worth driving home how funny this movie is.  Kumail's background as a comic really comes through, yet he also gives great lines and moments to other characters, too (my personal favorite being Ray Romano's line about cheating and loving someone).  The humor is also an integral part of the movie, not just because Kumail is a comic, but because his way of using humor to cope with a lot of uncomfortable moments tells us a lot about him as a character.  The humor here not only works, but services the characters and plot.  That's how you make a comedy, romantic or otherwise.

ANIMATED MOVIE: Coco

The above image from Coco isn't of the protagonist or his family, but to me it sums up what this movie is about better than any promotional poster can.  In my opinion Coco is prime Pixar, right up there with Wall-E, Up, Inside Out, and the Toy Story movies.  It has stunning visuals, a well-realized theme about balancing family loyalty with pursuing your dreams, and emotionally impactful moments that feel truly earned.  The only weakness it had was a plot-twist that can be seen coming a continent away, but as someone who personally doesn't care much about the surprise factor of plot twists in movies, it didn't take away much from my overall enjoyment of the film.

There's so much to say about how well this movie explored the theme of balancing the pursuit of your dreams with obligations to your family.  To start with, the family members who try to prevent Miguel from pursuing music aren't the normal "fuck your dreams!" plot devices that do nothing other than grumpily block the protagonist's path just because.  In Coco, we see the hardship and trauma that music has brought to the family.  What's more, we get a heartfelt speech from his abuelita about how much family means to her, and we see her pain in having to take care of a mother (Miguel's great grandmother) who doesn't even recognize her anymore.  This is not an abuela who wants to angrily block her grandson's dreams just because, but rather one who cares deeply about her family sticking together and being there for each other.

Aside from creating a family that is given a meaningful reason to reject music, the way the plot moves in service of its themes is also worth looking at.  The overall trajectory most of these "chase your dreams, even if it means defying your family!" movies follow is that the protagonist disobeys their family and their family is upset, but eventually they come around to see just how wrong they are.  Not here, though.  Instead, Miguel comes to learn the dangers of being the kind of person who is willing to throw away everything in order to get what they want.

Of coure, the family does come around, but the reconciliation that inevitably happens between them isn't the result of Miguel relentlessly chasing his goals while his family sorta just realizes the error of their ways.  Rather, Miguel shows them just how meaningful music can be, even for a family for whom music has left so much trauma.  One of my favorite scenes of the movie is when a family member who had constantly been dismissing music up to that point is put in a situation where she has to sing, and you can see how healing it is for her.  The whole family heals and grows together, creating poignant moments toward the end that are vintage Pixar.

As someone who is half Mexican, it was also wonderful to see a good-faith effort at inclusion of Mexican culture.  Of particular importance is the fact that there is representation behind the camera in addition to in front of it (or, in this case, in addition to the voice acting).  The choice of having Mexican and Mexican-American folks working on the project, particularly writer and co-director Adrian Molina, really made a difference.  Hopefully the success of this film can lead to more good-faith representation of different cultures that includes not just more diverse groups of actors, but also directors, writers, and other behind the scenes workers.  As Coco proves (as well as other films on this list, like The Big Sick and Get Out), the results are worth it.

ACTOR: Daniel Kaluuya

I'm basically doing some Oscars politics shit here by choosing the actor in my second favorite movie of the year (possibly first, who even knows, both Blade Runner 2049 and Get Out are too damn good to choose just one, and as I'm writing this I'm currently having a fierce internal debate about whether I should've chosen Get Out as my top movie and put Ryan Gosling in this spot, but I'm already this far, and also I'll end up regretting my choices either way, sooo...).  Ahem.

Luckily, Kaluuya puts in such a great performance in this film that he deserves this spot regardless of whatever dorky internal debate is going on in my head.  Kaluuya plays Christ Washington, a photographer with an eye for beautiful, melancholy shots and a white girlfriend who wants to take him home for the weekend to meet her family.  Considering the fact that it's in the horror/suspense genre, the weekend is predictably far from leisurely.

The role of Chris Washington is a quiet but expressive one that really lets Kaluuya shine.  His performance is grounded yet ranged, doing a great job of giving us such a variety of Kaluuya's emotions in subtle, quiet ways that show his abilities to emote without the need for excessive dialogue (though he does a good job with his lines, too).  This is important, especially where he is exasperated with the small forms of every-day racism in earlier scenes and terrified in later scenes for reasons I won't spoil.

Everything comes together perfectly in this movie.  Jordan Peele's writing and directing does a great job of exploring the black psyche and its fears in modern US society, with many parts of the movie brilliantly subverting the ways black folks are typically portrayed in popular US media.  Kaluuya gives Jordan's ideas amazing life, though, and makes Chris Washington a character to remember.  I can't wait to see his role in Black Panther.

ACTRESS: Sally Hawkins

This was a tough one, not only because there were two performances I loved this year, but because both were performances from lesser-known, offbeat, excellent movies that I'd love to give recognition to, so I couldn't even use that as a tie-breaker criteria.  I ended up going with Sally Hawkins in The Shape of Water because, while I actually liked Colossal a little more as a movie, The Shape of Water does demand a little more of Sally Hawkins than Colossal does of Anne Hathaway (though don't get it twisted, Hathaway plays a character well outside of her normal range of roles and absolutely nails it).

Anywho, on to my actual pick.  I was excited going into The Shape of Water because I love Guillermo del Toro, a master of dark fantasy stories with rich atmospheres and memorably odd characters.  However, I wondered going into the movie if I would be able to buy a Beauty and the Beast-type love story set during the Cold War with an amphibious creature as the love interest.  I feared that, despite my love for del Toro, this would just be too silly for me to take seriously.

Like my concerns with the Blade Runner sequel, this movie assuaged my fears.  Or, more accurately, Sally Hawkins did.  She plays the protagonist of the film, Elisa, a mute custodian at a top secret government facility who falls in love with the aquatic specimen in one of the labs.  She assumes the role with a quiet (obviously) but distinct warmth that makes it hard not to buy her character's thoughts and feelings at every step of the way, even when they would sound silly on paper.  Her ability to emote without the need of dialogue is truly outstanding.

Every other performance of the movie is excellent, too, particularly Richard Jenkins as her closeted best friend, Michael Shannon as the orderly yet unhinged villain, and Michael Stuhlbarg as the government scientist whose real allegiances you're kept uncertain of until the end.  With beautiful cinematography (seriously, look at what he does with the color green here) and an engaging, character-driven story, The Shape of Water was one of my favorite movies of the year.  And none of it would've worked without Sally Hawkins and her Oscar-worthy performance at its core.

MMA PROSPECT: Gökhan Saki
 
In a way, this entry feels like cheating.  Anyone who follows kickboxing knows who Gökhan Saki is. For those who don't, Saki is a high level Dutch kickboxer with both knockout power and good fight craft.  He has a versatile left hand which he uses to throw unpredictable combinations of hooks, body hooks, and uppercuts, sometimes two or three times in a row, and he often finishes his punching combinations with a chopping kick, usually to the leg.  He was the light heavyweight champion of Glory, currently the best kickboxing organization in the world.

Still, this entry is about his prospect as an MMA fighter.  After being out of kickboxing for two years, he made his UFC debut  in the light heavyweight division against Henrique da Silva in 2017.  In the fight his technique looked incredible.  He had also clearly been working on his takedown defense, having no trouble whenever da Silva shot for his hips or tried to get him into the greco clinch.  Because kickboxing rounds are each two minutes shorter than MMA rounds, however, Saki began to slow down toward the end of the first round (though it is also possible two years away from professional competition contributed to this as well).

Henrique da Silva began to find success as Saki tired, especially with some wonderfully placed knees.  Unfortunately for him, though, the more he gained momentum the more recklessly he decided to hunt the knockout.  As da Silva stood right in front of Saki and swung away without much thought given to defensive, Saki countered with a left hook so powerful it threw off the earth's orbit around the sun.  His entrance had been made.

I truly hope that Saki can make it to the top of the division.  It's no secret the division in serious need of some new top contenders, especially with Jon Jones having such an uncertain future.  Aside from Alexander "Incapable of Boring Title Fights" Gustafsson and rising contender Volkan Oezdemir, there are no serious threats to champion Daniel Cormier on the horizon.  Texeira, Manuwa, and OSP are all fine fighters, but it's pretty clear none of them are competitive with the likes of Cormier or Gustafsson.  Hopefully Oezdemir does well against Cormier at UFC 220, win or lose, and Saki continues to do well.  If that can happen and Jon Jones is also proven innocent in his USADA trial, we'll be back to a light heavyweight division as exciting as its mid-late 2000s glory days.

MMA FIGHTER I'D LIKE TO SEE BOUNCE BACK:
Yair Rodríguez

Yair Rodríguez was one of the most exciting prospects of the MMA world in the featherweight division, which to me is one of the most exciting divisions in the sport (if not the most exciting division).  His kicking ability is among the most exciting of MMA world today, throwing sidekicks the way most fighters throw jabs and chaining together round kicks in a way you usually only see in fighting video games.

In May of last year, however, Frankie Edgar put a stop to Yair's unbeaten streak in the UFC by hitting him with so much ground and pound that the left side of Yair's face was almost sent to a hamburger meat processing factory by mistake.  Edgar relentlessly closed the distance between him and Yair with a crafty combination of feints, intelligently aggressive footwork, and mixing up the threat of his punches and takedowns to keep Yair uncomfortable.  Once he got Yair on the ground it was mostly over, though Yair was never completely out of the fight, going for things like kneebars and back takes whenever he could.

I hope the fight ends up proving to be a growing experience for Yair.  Going forward, he of course needs to work on dealing with elite wrestlers.  His punches could also use some work too, as he often ignores his reach advantage and gets into brawls where he throws long, loopy hooks whenever his opponent gets into boxing range.  I think he would benefit tremendously from studying lanky Jackson-Winkeljohn fighters like Jon Jones, Carlos Condit, and Donald Cerrone and how they so perfectly use their reach advantage.  Specifically Jones's stiff-arming, Cerrone's counter step-knees that he throws whenever someone charges in on him, and the counter-elbows all three have been using when opponents charge in.  All of these could be an invaluable asset to Rodriguez.

Overall, Yair has world class kicks, speed, and a penchant for putting on exciting fights.  If he can sharpen up other areas of his game, become better at setting up his kicks instead of just throwing them in volume, and learn how to use his strengths in different ranges, he could be champion someday.  Hopefully 2018 sees Yair's return to the win column and continued ascent up the featherweight rankings.

MALE MMA FIGHTER: Demetrious Johnson

What can we say about perhaps the most well-rounded MMA fighter in the world right now?  This year he beat Wilson Reis and Ray Borg to set the UFC record for most consecutive title defenses with eleven, beating Anderson Silva's old record of ten.  While Reis and Borg aren't the toughest competition he's fought (Joseph Benavidez, John Dodson, and Kyoji Horiguchi are arguably the best fighters he's beaten), the skill and preparation it takes to consistently stay on top for so long is mind-blowing.  Until the rumored fight between him and TJ Dillashaw takes places, there don't seem to be too many significant challenges to Johnson's reign any time soon.

FEMALE MMA FIGHTER: Rose Namajunas

Could there be any doubt about who would get this spot?  Going into this year, Joanna Jędrzejczyk looked unstoppable.  Her world-class Muay Thai made her look like an assassin against elite competition like Jessica Andrade and Karolina Kowalkiewicz, using her world class footwork, straight punches, and well set up kicks.  Going into her fight with Rose and UFC 217, few people gave Rose much of a chance.  No one gave her a chance of winning by knockout.

This fight perfectly proved the saying "anything can happen in MMA."  Rose's gameplan was to give Joanna something she wasn't used to: a cautious style centering around the use of feints.  It was clear in this fight that Joanna had gotten used to her opponents coming toward her as the aggressor.  Rose, on the other hand, forced Joanna to lead and used an impressive amount of feints to throw her off.

The thing about well-done feints is that they make reacting really difficult for your opponent.  Mixing in feints and actual attacks makes it hard for your opponent to know whether your next movement will be another feint or an actual attack.  Every singe time Rose so much as twitched, Joanna never knew what to expect.  This left Joanna profoundly uncomfortable, as she hadn't had to worry as much about this in her previous fights, especially against her last three forward-charging opponents.  The knockout came when a frustrated Joanna moved forward and was clipped by a perfectly timed left hook from Rose.

Seeing an underdog beat perhaps the most respected female MMA fighter fighting today was quite a treat.  A rematch seems inevitable, and I personally can't wait to see it.  We'll see if everything that has been said about Joanna underestimating Rose holds up.  Was it a fluke, or does Rose have the skills and gameplaning abilities to beat Joanna a second time?  Only time will tell, but either way, it'll be something truly exciting to witness.

MMA FIGHT: Eddie Alvarez vs Justin Gaethje

Honestly, as we drew closer toward the end of the year, there were no fights that wowed me on a deep enough level that made me think "ah, yes, this fight is clearly a contender for my fight of the year."  Don't get me wrong, there were quite a few fights I enjoyed in 2017.  I can't remember any card not having at least a couple fights that left me satisfied.  Still, nothing really stuck with me the way fights like Lawler vs Condit did last year.

Then Eddie Alvarez vs Justin Gaethje happened.

This fight had everything any type of fight fan could ever want.  Many descriptions of this fight frame it as a primal, vicious brawl, and on some level it was, but both fighters were doing more than just swinging like some sort of Wanderlei Silva vs Brian Stann sequel (which, don't get me wrong, was a fight I loved also).  In this fight Alvarez used excellent head movement, doubled up on punches with the same hand, feinted takedowns to set up strikes, and switched between attacks to the body and head.  When Gaethje started defending Alvarez's body shots, Alvarez would to go the head.  When Gaethje started holding his hands high, Alvarez went to the body.  Add in some superbly faked takedowns (with the occasional attempt for a real one) that further threw off Gaethje's defenses and you can see why Alvarez is at the very top of the sport.

Meanwhile, while Gaethje's approach was a little less sophisticated than Alvarez's, he was still strategically using his leg kicks to wear Alvarez down throughout the fight.  During his best moments, he brilliantly used the threat of leg kicks to set up other strikes.  His most successful punches came while Alvarez was worried about taking more abuse on his legs, particularly his lead leg, and especially in the later rounds.  While Gaethje lost, the fact that Alvarez could barely stand shows just how important a weapon leg kicks can be.

This match will go down as an all-time great fight, as it was the rare type of fight that satisfied everyone from the chaos-loving casual fan to the more technical-minded hardcore fans.  Considering Gaethje, a relative newcomer, did so well against a fighter of Alvarez's caliber, his performance is hardly anything to be ashamed of.  The only real losers of the bout were Henry Cejudo and Sergio Pettis, who had to fight immediately after this instant classic.  Hopefully this fight ends up giving both Alvarez and Gaethje more recognition among casual MMA fans.  They both more than deserve it.

SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY: Brain Benefits of Exercise

Everyone knows that exercise is good for your body.  Most of us have even heard that it's good for our mental health, and those of us that exercise regularly can tell from first hand experience that it does with great certainty.  But how about helping our brain as a whole?

More and more research over the last few years has delved into the effect that exercise has on our brains.  Not just the ability to temporarily boost mood, but on the more profound neurobiological effects on your brain chemistry.  The results have been pretty dramatic.  Exercise has been shown to help memory and prevent neurologically degenerative diseases like dementia and Alzhiemer's as you age.

The reason exercise benefits your brain is because of the process of neurogensis.  Don't be fooled by the sci fi-sounding name, neurogensis simply means the creation of new neurons in your brain.  The newest scientific studies are showing that exercise benefits neurogenesis, both in creating healthier neurons and engaging in neurogenesis more often.  Mixed with the fact that exercise has already been shown to reduce signs of depression for a long time, it's time to start thinking of exercise as not just important for physical health, but brain health.

Maybe the jocks were the smartest of us all in high school?

SCIENTIFIC INVENTION: Floating Wind Farms

Wind energy is rad because it doesn't create carbon emissions, which is kind of a big deal when scientists agree man-made climate change is a thing.  Alternative forms of energy are vital when it comes to keeping society going while also making sure we don't completely wreck our planet.  Or, more accurately, affect our planet in a way that adversely affects most life on Earth, including us.  Earth will be fine whether or not we survive.

One of the issues with wind energy, however, is that it requires immense amounts of land to properly operate.  While we aren't exactly facing land shortages in the United States, that isn't necessarily the case in other places.  Luckily, another location for wind farms has emerged: the water.

Earlier this year, Scotland opened the world's first floating wind farm.  The technology uses an incredibly sophisticated software that responds to the wind and water current at sea which allows the wind farm to be productive out on the water.  Considering water makes up 71% of Earth's surface, floating wind farms could someday be an even bigger source of power than landed wind farms.

The costs of a floating wind farm are still far too high for it to be used on a wider scale, but estimates are that costs can be made affordable by 2030.  If that happens, Scotland's bold first step could be an important one in creating a future where energy is sustainable and we aren't wrecking our environment.  Let's hope so.

BULLSHIT NEWS STORY: Trump in General

Usually this spot is reserved for silly, apolitical false news stories that reveal something about us as a society.  I'm kinda sad that can't be the case this year.  Not because I don't like getting political, but because this is usually the one place on the list I can flex my social psychology muscle.  With Trump's penchant for making things up and calling everything he dislikes "fake news" to no negative consequence, however, it's a little disingenuous to have a category about bullshit news and not bring this up.  As a historian, it's hard not to be at least a little concerned.

There's a countless amount of blatantly false things Trump has said this year, to the point where articles consulting psychologists have been written to analyze what Trump's lies mean for our national psyche.  Politicians of every political party lie, but the amount and scope of Trump's lies are truly unprecedented.  Most concerning are his lies that stoke fires of bigotry, such as his completely unsubstantiated claim back in 2016 that he would've won the popular vote if undocumented immigrants hadn't engaged in mass voter fraud.  This anti-immigrant rhetoric has real consequences in the form of hate crimes and anti-immigration legislation, so it's anything but harmless.

Now, when it comes to his accusations of "fake news" against mainstream news outlets, I wanna be careful here and point out that mainstream news outlets aren't perfect.  Aside from normal human errors that will happen in any human endeavor, mainstream news outlets are motivated by profit, resulting in misleading clickbait articles that have attention grabbing-headlines that often end up being bullshit.  Also, news outlets are corporations, and corporate conflict of interests do have an effect on the news we read.

But Trump isn't talking about that.  To him, credible news is news that covers him favorably, and fake news is news that covers him unfavorably.  That should alarm anyone who gives a shit about democracy.  While I don't think Trump is going to destroy what democracy we do have or turn the US into a dictatorship, or even think that it's a concrete goal of his, his disdain for the free press is alarming, and he could very well lay the ground work for the erosion of free press and democracy in the future.  It sounds hard to believe, but history shows us that every society and its institutions are vulnerable to decay.  Never think that things will always remain the way they are.

ACTUAL NEWS STORY: Me Too

Could there be any doubt?  Created by Tarana Burke in 2007 as a slogan of sorts for her non-profit Just Be Inc, a nonprofit dedicated to helping survivors of sexual assault, the movement took off in October of this year amid the uncovering of the Harvey Weinstein's heinous, extensive list of sexual assaults he committed using his position of power.  As more women came forward, actress Alyssa Milano used the hashtag #metoo as she voiced support for Rose McGowan and other survivors of sexual assault.

The flood gates opened.  The Me Too movement has become an incredibly powerful one that has allowed countless sexual assault survivors, primarily women but also men and non-binary folks, to come forward about their experiences and, this is the big one, possibly even see consequences for the predators.  Many famous and/or powerful men have been called out.  It's nice to see that more people feel able like they can talk about their experiences and even see consequences for their abusers to prevent them from doing the same thing to more people in the future.

There are only two issues that muddy the waters.  One is the fact that, in the wake of a wealthy white woman being the one to spread this hashtag, the truth that Burke coined this phrase is being pushed aside in many conversations about the Me Too movement.  Now, it should be noted that Milano herself has done everything she can to give Burke credit, but quite frankly, too much of the media covering this is still attributing things to Milano.  This is an ugly continuation of the historical trend of prioritizing powerful women, particularly white women, over less powerful women, particularly women of color.

The other issue is that a lot of this has been framed as a problem of sexual assault in the entertainment industry, when there are also politicians (of both major parties) and business people who are being accused, but often not receiving quite the same attention.  President Trump is one of them.  And it'd be fucking ridiculous to pretend it only happens in those industries, too.  It's just that powerful women in the entertainment, political, and business industries will have more ability to call these things out than everyday women.

Still, it's nice to see such a reckoning of terrible people happen, and I hope it doesn't fade from the public eye soon.  We need to make sure all predatory people of all types, in all industries, are held accountable.  Hopefully this trend continues, and that those who sexually assault less powerful women begin to see consequences, too.

MEME: Distracted Boyfriend Meme

This meme may have been over-saturated by the end of its run, like all popular memes, but people have created some truly outstanding ones.  Here's a great collection of them.

VIDEO: "Keep Politics Out of Games"

One of the hottest topics in the gamer community is whether or not video games should be considered art.  Obviously, most people in the gamer community say yes.  Personally, I fall somewhere between "yes, because video games at their best can offer thoughtful, poignant experiences comparable to other creative mediums at their best" and "who cares, the concept of 'real art' is often arbitrary, elitist, and ultimately pointless."

However, despite our fervent defense of games as art, it's also become a rallying cry of gamers upset with critical analyses of gaming to respond with the rally cry "it's just a game, get your politics out of my fun past time!"

We can't have it both ways, gamers.  I've written about the subject before.  But this video from Games As Literature articulates a similar argument with much more detail and historical context than my post does.  Definitely give this video a watch, as well as the Games As Literature channel in general.  He has great analyses of the literary story-telling devices in games that I haven't seen anywhere else on the internet (my personal favorite being his analysis of the underrated RPG Legend of Dragoon).

PHOTO: Richard Spencer Catching Those Hands

Glorious.

BADASS: Female YPJ Forces

Tracing its roots back to the Arab Spring, the Syrian Civil War began with demonstrations against the Bashar al-Assad regime that escalated into armed conflict in March of 2011 thanks to the authoritarian violence of Assad.  The war has raged on since.  The death toll has been enormous, and that's saying nothing of the people who have been displaced or the infrastructure that has been destroyed, which in turn results in basic needs of many of those in Syria not being met.

One of the least encouraging parts of the early days of the Syrian Civil War was how chaotic it was, and how the opposition against it was so splintered.  The only organized opposition at first seemed to be ISIS/ISIL, aka the Earth's biggest assholes, so it became a bit of a conundrum.  Who do you support in the battle between Assad's violent secular authoritarianism and ISIL's violent religious fundamentalism?  Things seemed grim for people who wanted basic human decency to win out in Syria.

Since then the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) have emerged.  Initially a majority Kurdish force despite Kurds being a minority in the region, it has since grown and includes a large amount of Arabs as well.  The SDF fights for secular social democracy in the region, standing as an important contrast to both Assad and ISIL.

Among the fighters of the SDF are the Women's Protection Units (or YPJ, which is the Kurdish acronym for these forces).  Because the SDF's goals include the liberation of women, women have organized and fought in these YPJ units against Assad, ISIL, and other regressive forces in Syria.  More can be found out about these women here.  Long story short, though, these women are incredibly brave badasses who face especially dire consequences if they fail (especially against ISIL for what they do to women), but they keep fighting on and gaining ground despite the risks.

Salute, ladies.

Monday, June 16, 2014

The Three Amigos of Cinema

As any of you who know me in real life are aware of, I am half Mexican.  As you also know, my appearance and last name do little to differentiate me from any other white dude.  Growing up, I was raised more by my mom than my dad, and my mom was my Latin@* parent, so that created an interesting dynamic.  We had a comal in the house, we enjoyed tons of Mexican food (chorizo, mole, pan dulce, etc), some of our nicknames were in Spanish, and I grew up with a sense of community generally more common amongst Latin@ folks.

However, my sister and I grew up in Virginia for seven years, where we were very disconnected from our Mexican heritage.  It wasn't a choice by our mom not to teach us, but rather because there was no Mexican community there for us to join.  We didn't learn Spanish, didn't grow up with any sort of Mexican popular culture, and didn't know anything about Mexican holidays.  When we moved back to California, the Mexican population of Virginia dropped exponentially.

We have been back here for well over a decade now and I have become conversationally fluent in Spanish, but the disconnect from Mexican culture has been harder to repair.

I have been successful to a small degree, though, by doing what works for me.  Instead of celebrating el Dia de los Santos Reyes or dancing corridos, I've reconnected in ways that make more sense to who I am as a person.  One is by studying Latin American history.  Another has been through Mexican film.  In modern Mexican cinema, three names stand out above the rest.
 

They are often called the "Three Amigos of Mexican cinema": Alejandro González Iñárritu, Alfonso Cuarón, and Guillermo del Toro.  These three directors have been responsible for some of the best films to come out of Mexico since the new millennium, and indeed some of the best films the entire world has seen since then.  The three of them are good friends in real life and help each other out with their projects from time to time.  Here I will name my favorite film from each of them, and more importantly explain why I chose each of these films.

*for anyone who hasn't seen the term "Latin@" before, the "@" is there instead of an "o" or "a" so as to be more gender inclusive


Alejandro González Iñárritu: Biutiful



This film follows Javier Bardem as Uxbal, a divorced father in Spain who manages both a group of undocumented Chinese workers who manufacture knock-off designer products and undocumented African street vendors who sell these items. Near the beginning of the movie, he is diagnosed with prostate cancer and has to figure out what to do with his kids before he passes, while also trying to keep his affairs in order for as long as he can despite all the stress and chaos.  When this movie was first released, a lot of critics praised Bardem's performance but didn't care for the film overall.  They felt it was too dismal, not much more than a nihilist portrait of suffering.

González Iñárritu took issue with that.  He pointed out that, while it follows a person at the end of their life, "it's an homage to life. It's a life that you care about. It's an expression of a simple man in a very complex situation, where a man under the toughest circumstances ever is able to find love, to find forgiveness, to find compassion, to understand the meaning of his own life, and how people feel about him. And that's what I consider to be uplifting, it's an homage to a life that was lived with dignity."  This vision of what he was going for matches up with how I observed the film when I saw it.

Uxbal goes through a lot in the movie and it certainly is an emotionally draining experience, but part of what makes it emotionally draining is the fact you grow to care about him and his kids.  This is done through scenes of joy that are incredibly sparse throughout the movie, but incredibly rewarding.  These few happy scenes feel like a well-earned breath of fresh air that make the despair worth it.  They give life to the characters, especially Xubal and his older child Ana.  Ana is a kind hearted girl who smiles as much as she can given the bitter circumstances handed to her by life, and she tries to hold onto this warmth even when things are crumbling right in front of her. If you don't grow attached to her and find yourself genuinely concerned about what will happen to her by the end of the movie, you are dead inside.

The other aspect of this movie that blew me away was how human and complex all of the others involved in the tragic counterfeit operation web were.  Usually in a movie about a person trying to make the best of a bad situation in life, everyone else in the movie is a caricature of greed, apathy, foolishness, or straight up malice.  Here, everyone else clearly seemed similar to Uxbal- real human beings caught in fucked up circumstances.

One great segment that illustrates this involves the undocumented African immigrants selling the phony products.  In the beginning Uxbal goes off on them for selling the goods in the public squares with lots of foot traffic, since there is an abundance of cops in the area.  He tells them they should be selling them in the lower sections of town, in more secluded spots.  Later on, they end up going back to some of the large public squares to sell the merchandise again.  The cops spot them and a huge raid ensues.

Afterward, Uxbal confronts one of them about it.  Normally, this is the part where the group would be portrayed as reckless idiots who should've just listened to directions.  Not here, though.  The person instead responds by telling Uxbal that they never make enough money when they sell in the areas that are less crowded and lower income.  Sure, they may get caught when they go to the more crowded, upscale places- but if they sell away from there, they are guaranteed to not make enough money to feed their families.  What would you do in that situation?

Having watched some of his other movies, like Amores Perros and Babel, I can tell González Iñárritu and I have one thing in common: we both think Gael García Bernal is a pretty cool guy and we'd like to hangout with him or whatever.  But also, we both clearly think about death a lot.  Not in the sense that we hate life or like the idea of death, but in the sense that the idea we will die someday is something that is constantly at the back of our minds.  González Iñárritu responded to that by making a movie that, while often full of despair, offers the portrait of a person who spends their last days with as much dignity and good intentions as possible given his situation.


Alfonso Cuarón: Gravity



When this first movie was announced, I had zero interest in seeing it.  And I don't mean zero degrees Fahrenheit disinterest- I mean zero degrees Kelvin disinterest.  Another disaster movie about things going wrong, but this time in space?  I'm pretty sure if you assembled a team of linguists and translators, they'd tell you that this movie premise is a culturally universal way to tell people around the world to go fuck themselves.

When the movie started getting positive buzz from the film community and good reviews from critics, my interest was piqued.  Eventually, after a couple weeks and enough good reviews from friends whose opinions on movies tend to sync up with mine, I went to go see it and was glad I did.  I was blown away in a way I hadn't been in a long time at the movies: I was actually in awe.

The movie did a good job of making me feel the scope and immensity of space.  The cinematography and editing are top notch, done in a way that make you feel the quiet majesty of the cosmos.  Normally in movies set in space, there is a fast paced approach to the presentation, designed to make it feel exciting.  It is a fun approach and there is nothing wrong with it, but I personally like the way it was presented here better.  The shots are wide, slow, and panning.  Even when the plot would get tense, the cinematography occasionally calmly pans out to remind us how insignificant the protagonist is in the grand scheme of things.

Aside from the technical aspects, the way this movie plays helped push this cosmic grandeur along, too.  This wasn't a universe bent on the destruction of Sandra Bullock's character, Doctor Ryan Stone.  Rather, it is a vast universe that doesn't care about her one way or the other.  This is also illustrated when the doctor tells the story of how her child died.  It wasn't some brutal murder or tragic suicide; her young daughter simply slipped, fell on the playground, and died.  That's all there was to it.

Of course, if this movie were only about how insignificant we are in the universe, then we wouldn't get much out of it we couldn't already get in those thoughtful nights staring up at the ceiling before falling asleep.  Grounding this movie is Dr Stone's own personal story.  This film is as intimate as it is vast; that's what helps make it great.  At the center of everything, the main character has to deal with her own struggle for survival in a harsh, cold universe.  She also has to find the drive to keep pushing through it- there is a scene where she almost gives up on her mission to come out of the disaster alive that is quite emotionally disarming.  The way she finds her way back leaves a bit to be desired in my opinion, but everything up to that point is very poignant and fantastically executed.

The film also does a good job of making a statement about the human condition by making parallels between the space stations.  For instance, each space station has a little miniature religious figure or symbol on their dashboards.  To me, these represent the idea that all people around the world try both to assign a grand meaning to their lives and find answers to life's biggest questions.  Its one of the crucial ways we cope with our existence.  The specifics in how we search and what answers we come up with may be different, but our quest for meaning and answers is universal.  This movie, then, doesn't just make you feel for Dr Stone's quest for survival and meaning, but does so in a way that can make you think about your own as well.  That's what a great movie has the power to do.


Guillermo del Toro: Pan's Labyrinth



While each of these directors have multiple movies I am a fan of, del Toro gave me the biggest trouble in trying to choose my favorite.  It took me a while to choose between Pacific Rim and this movie because I enjoyed them in very different ways.  The former was a critically underrated movie that had quality characterization, an intricately crafted world, and a lot of heart.  The film also had a woman of color in a leading role (how sad is it that this is so rare it warrants being mentioned?).  I think that if the movie had just given proper emotional weight to the deaths that occurred, it might have been on here instead.

Pan's Labyrinth is a very different film from Pacific Rim in almost every way, except for the fact they both use fictional fantasy creatures of del Toro's own design (with plenty of outside inspiration, of course).  In this movie, they are used ambiguously.  You never quite know if they are really there, or if the child is using her imagination as a coping mechanism to help deal with all the horrors she is experiencing.  In Pacific Rim, on the other hand, the fictional monsters represented, uhh... global warming?  And how we can solve it with giant robot punches?  Aw yeah.

The film takes place in Spain after the Spanish Civil War that lasted from 1936 to 1939.  It follows the young girl Ofelia, whose pregnant mother Carmen has recently married a captain in the fascist Franco military.  The movie has three different wavelengths, if you will: Ofelia struggling against her awful new stepfather, Ofelia going on a series of adventures given to her by a faun that she was led to by a fairy, and a bigger plot about political resistance against the fascist Franco government by their housekeeper Mercedes and several other characters.  This is a lot to balance and one movie, but del Toro manages to pull it off.

What is remarkable is that del Toro not only pulls off this ambitious balance, but he synthesizes them together well, too.  These three different aspects of the movie are interconnected, and that's what makes them work so well.  As mentioned above, you are never completely sure if the mythical creatures are real or a product of Ofelia's imagination.  No one other than Ofelia sees the creatures or any of the magic that is supposedly going on.  There is a confrontation between her and her stepfather involving her pregnant mom and a mandrake root that makes you wonder if the creatures and their magic are real, but there is no way to be certain.

Those two elements are also woven into the greater story about resistance against Franco fascism as well.  Certain plot events push forward events in Ofelia's own personal life, and vice versa.  This especially becomes true towards the end of the movie, though I won't spoil anything.  Suffice it to say, things escalate severely and, as you can probably imagine, not everyone makes it out alive.

This movie has often been called an adult fairy tale, and I can't think of a better way to describe it.  While this film might not try to tackle themes as ambitious as dignity in the face of death or trying to find meaning despite our insignificance in the cosmic sense, it creates an intricate, skillfully woven plot, immersive world, great use of tension, and contains quite a few heart felt moments.  In his Great Movies review for the film Spirited Away, Roger Ebert said that "movies made for everybody are really made for nobody in particular", and that "movies about specific characters in a detailed world are spellbinding because they make no attempt to cater to us; they are defiantly, triumphantly, themselves."  There are few films that are as spell-binding and uniquely itself as Pan's Labyrinth.