Superman has just about always been my favorite superhero. Ever since I was a kid, I wanted to be the big, blue boy scout. Not just in terms of his powers, but to truly be like him. Of course I wanted the super strength and ability to fly, but I also wanted to live up to the example he set.
During my high school years I turned away from superheroes in general, but then The Dark Knight got me back into them again. I jumped on the Batman hype train like everyone else, but within a few years I was back to Superman being my favorite. Every time a big Superman project got announced, I was paying attention. Whether a show or movie, I was there- sometimes for better, sometimes for worse.
This time around was no different. The moment James Gunn's Supes project was announced, I was interested. As more and more came out about it, I was genuinely excited. Then, finally, the day came. My wife and I watched it last Friday. We wore Superman shirts to the theater; her with the new logo, me with the more classic one.
Ultimately, I really liked the movie. The fun and sincerity James Gunn and everyone else infused into it brought me a lot of joy. For those who like straightforward movie ratings, I'd give it an 8/10 and call it one of the better Blockbuster movies in recent years. If you're a fan of Superman (or even just the genre in general), check it out. You'll likely have a good time.
When it comes to a Superman project, though, I can't just give a simple score and leave it at that. Especially for one like this- one where so many things work, but not quite everything. Like I said above, I really liked this movie- but I didn't love it. I've been thinking about it quite a bit since seeing, trying to sort through exactly what did and didn't work for me. This post is what I've come up with.
Note that I will not have any spoilers here, other than talking about stuff that either happens within the first couple minutes of the movie or stuff that was revealed in the trailers. With that said, if you haven't seen the movie and want to go into it relatively fresh, it may be good to hold off on reading this post anyway. I personally prefer to go into movies relatively uninformed so that I can be surprised (hopefully pleasantly) by what I see. So don't worry about spoilers, but maybe considering holding off anyway.
Either way, enjoy!
WHAT DID WORK FOR ME
1. What We Get of Lois and Clark
A lot of Superman fans say that, despite the relative overall quality of any given Superman movie, Superman and Lois themselves are usually cast pretty well. I agree with that statement for the most part. Still, sometimes even a well-cast Lois and Clark duo have no chemistry (looking at you Henry Cavill and Amy Adams). Luckily, this pairing of Lois and Clark work really well, both individually and as a couple.
Very early in the movie we get a great scene of a date night turning into Lois interviewing Superman after she pointed out she's rarely gotten the chance to do so. The interview starts off well, but Lois completely transitions into journalist mode and grills him to the point it starts a fight between them. It's a perfect scene to show their dynamic, including how different they are and how Lois's dedication to being a tough, quality journalist can get in the way of her personal relationships.
Later on in the movie they reconcile and talk about what they love about each other. I'll leave it at that because it's further into the movie and therefore much more of a spoiler to talk about even in general terms, but what I like about it is that it captures why these two always fall in love with one another in every iteration of Superman. This and the previous scene are two of my favorite scenes in the movie. I wish they could've been built toward a little better, and that we could have had maybe another scene or two to trace out the arc of their relationship in this movie overall (consider this foreshadowing for later in this post), but the scenes in and of themselves are fantastic.
2. Green Lantern and Mr Terrific
If you've seen any of the promotional material for this movie at all, you know that Green Lantern, Hawkgirl, and a guy named Mr Terrific are part of this movie as the "Justice Gang." Unfortunately Hawkgirl simply does not get much screen time or interesting things to do (other than one amazing moment at the end I won't spoil). Green Lantern and Mr Terrific, however, get plenty of shine in this movie.
Starting with Green Lantern, he's played in this movie by Nathan Fillion, probably best known for his role in the show Firefly. This Green Lantern he plays is named Guy Gardner, the most conceited and arrogant of the humans who have wielded the Green Lantern ring. In this movie, his high opinion of himself is played for effective laughs. He steals a lot of the scenes he's in with his big personality. Of all the times I laughed in the movie, Fillion's Green Lantern was usually involved.
Mr Terrific is a very different character. He's also a much more obscure one. He's basically a super genius inventor, but his costume is a cross between a tech genius and a cool 1970s black guy who would probably say stuff like "dig this, cool cat." The outfit reflects the character more broadly; he has all the smarts of the former, but all the style of the latter. It makes for a really compelling, original character. The fact he gets much more screen time than his teammates (and even many of the main cast) gives him even more room to shine. Ed Gathegi takes advantage of the opportunity in the role and creates one of the most memorable superheroes in years.
3. The Sincerity and Kindness
The sincerity and kindness of this version of Superman was a focus for James Gunn in the beginning. Gunn said in one interview: "for me, the center of it was about kindness in a world that isn't kind." In another interview he points out Superman is "an immigrant that came from other places and populated the country, but for me it is mostly a story that says basic human kindness is a value and is something we have lost."
Those quotes really set the tone for what's at the heart of this movie. Superman doesn't just defeat bad guys. He interactions with the people of Metropolis, remembers their names, cares about them, and tries to save everyone and everything he can- even a squirrel! In fact, this Superman is earnest to a bit of an embarrassing degree. He's teased more than once in the movie about what a boy scout he is. This is not a movie that views Superman the figure with the same sort of reverence the Richard Donner movies had for Superman.
But there's something lovely about that. Reeve's Superman is almost a guardian angel for humanity. This Superman is an overly earnest, vulnerable, borderline dorky human being who happens to have powers. It's so corny it goes back around to being cool again (which is part of why this movie has inspired so many people to say "kindness is the new punk rock"). I think that's great. Heaven knows we could use more kindness in this world. Especially in some of the areas on Earth suffering most right now. Speaking of which...
4. The Message Against Warmongering
The beginning fight happens in this movie because a fictional country called Boravia wants to invade another fiction country called Jarhanpur. Superman, who doesn't want people to die, rightfully stops Boravia from invading Jarhanpur. That ends up being a controversial move for him to make, however, especially considering Boravia is "an important US ally." Superman, though, defends his actions and continues to oppose Boravia's continued attempts to invade Jarhanpur.
Audiences have understood this message to be a criticism of Israel for their invasion of Gaza and a criticism of Russia for its invasion of Ukraine. James Gunn has disavowed the Israel/Palestine comparison, if not the Russia/Ukraine one, but that doesn't seem to matter too much. Maybe it shouldn't. Sometimes art reflects reality so precisely that it doesn't matter what its creators intended. Sometimes art can point things out that are so relevant to our moment in history that it can channel and comment on that moment even if an overt, direct connection wasn't intentional.
The similarities to Israel/Palestine and Russia/Ukraine start out only in a general sense, but throughout the movie there are some oddly specific parallels that make it hard to believe there weren't at least a couple people involved with the movie who wanted to make a direct comparison. Again, though, we cannot know true intent. All I can say is that this movie unapologetically opposes wars of aggression. Even if watching this movie is not some sort of act of anti-war resistance, it is nice to see a major blockbuster directly, earnestly make that point.
WHAT DIDN'T WORK FOR ME
1. Lack of Time Building Key Relationships
Earlier I said that I really liked the Lois/Clark relationship in this movie, but wish the key moments had been built toward better. That's where this entry comes in. As much as I liked that relationship, it just didn't feel like it was given the attention it deserved. Neither did a number of other important relationships in this movie.
Take Jonathan and Martha Kent, Clark's adopted parents. They are barely in this movie for two scenes. I won't talk about those scenes in detail. I will say this, though: like the Lois/Clark scenes, they're lovely. But they're just not built toward at all. For as perfectly executed as those scenes are, I just didn't feel much emotion in them. Because there is no groundwork laid by getting to know these characters, how they relate to one another, and what they have done for each other. In writing, you can't just have big, meaningful, cathartic scenes without setting them up. The first scene we get with the Kents is supposed to be a powerful one, but it's also basically the first time we meet them as characters.
A big problem is that this movie starts with Superman already facing down the main villains of the movie. You're basically thrown into the middle of the action. The advantage of this approach is that you start off on an exciting foot and can get to the action more quickly. What you lose, though, is setting up the world, its characters, and- once again- the relationships between them. It's not the most glamorous parts of most movies, but it is the setup that allows for bigger payoffs later. We just do not get enough of that in this movie. Hell, the Daily Planet staff (other than Jimmy Olsen) are basically just background characters.
I think the reason the movie doesn't take time to develop its world, characters, and relationships better is because, well...
2. It Was Pretty Crowded!
This movie has a lot going on. As we already covered, it starts already after the conflict that defines this movie has popped off. By skipping all the setup, we start off with a bang. The movie still needs to set up it world and introduce its characters, though, even if they don't start at the "beginning" per se. And wow is there a lot in here! We have Superman, Lois, Krypto, three members of the Justice Gang, a couple additional heroes who get introduced throughout the film, the Daily Planet staff, the Kents, and a whole stable of villains. And those are just the central characters! It's a lot to balance. Frankly, it's too much.
Some people have said that this movie almost feels like watching the second or third entry in a Superman film series, rather than the first. I think there's a lot to that take. Because what they're getting at really combines this entry and the previous one: things aren't fully set up, yet a ton of things are introduced. I think if this were the sequel to a previous Superman movie that had fully brought in Superman, Lois, Krypto, the Daily Planet staff, the Kents, and maybe Lex Luthor, and defined their relationships and done the less flashy but necessary legwork to build our connection to them as an audience, then this movie could be one of the greatest superhero sequels of all time.
But it isn't. Instead, the first movie we get with this version of Superman is so crowded that no one character has full room to breath. Each character gets some great movies, and sometimes great scenes with other characters, but very few threads are woven throughout the whole thing because no character other than Superman can get the necessary attention to be fully fleshed out. This issue also pairs with...
3. The Lack of Emotional Gravity
A problem with a lot of Blockbusters over the past decade is that they don't have the dramatic weight they should have in order to make their more emotional moments hit harder. This movie doesn't fully have that problem (I've already made allusions to big, sincere moments that work really well), but it does have it to an extent. It's not helped by the previous two issues, either. The fact that the movie is so crowded it has trouble fully developing character relationships (and therefore, deeper emotional stakes for when those relationships are tested or those characters are put into danger) means sometimes things aren't felt as strongly as they should be.
A related problem to all of this is that when something serious and potentially impactful does happen, that thread is not woven into the fuller story beyond the next couple scenes. In writing, creating conflict is something that's supposed to build upon itself and have ripples throughout the story. Bad or important things that happen should accumulate throughout the story, and consequences should continue to mount. I don't just mean in terms of the action, like the consequences of a villainous action or mad science experiment gone wrong. But every character's inner conflict, every strain in a relationship between people, and especially every death should reverberate throughout the story. Again, this movie isn't totally absent any of that stuff, but it's much less fleshed out than it could. Often it's pushed to the wayside so that we can get more fun comic book moments, silly jokes, and big action set pieces.
The fun, airy, action-focused approach of this movie makes for an enjoyable time. Without better developed emotional stakes, though, it's almost designed to be surprisingly forgettable beyond the few standout moments. Again, I liked the movie. I think creating a story that is fun with a few genuinely memorable moments of sincerity and real emotional impact is a good thing! I loved a lot of what Superman did on screen! I just can't help but feel we could've gotten something more.
4. Lex Luthor is Too Interesting to be a Billionaire
This entry is, of course, not actually a problem I had with the movie at all. I just can't help but compare how compelling Lex Luthor is as a billionaire mega-villain compared to the more banal villainy and lamer personalities of our real life billionaire baddies. He's not nearly as dull as the off-putting Peter Thiel, the deeply unfunny Elon Musk, or the black hole of humanity Jeff Bezos. Where Lex Luthor is driven by an interesting blend of different motivations, resulting in some of the best villain monologues in years, these guys are driven by pretty mundane combinations of greed and egomania.
I'd rather we not be oppressed in real life by villainous billionaires. But as long as we are, couldn't they at least be a little more interesting? One can only wish.